Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? - Bastian, H.; Glasziou, P.; Chalmers, I. (PLoS Med, 2010)

Introduction: rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews - Egger, M.; Smith, G. D.; O'Rourke, K. (BMJ Publishing Group, 2008)

Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions - Cook, D. J.; Mulrow, C. D.; Haynes, R. (Ann Intern Med, 1997)

AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care - Brouwers, M. C.; Kho, M. E.; Browman, G. P. (CMAJ, 2010)

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence - Chalmers, I.; Glasziou, P. (Lancet, 2009)

How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set - Chalmers, I.; Bracken, M. B.; Djulbegovic, B. (Lancet, 2014)

Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis - Ioannidis, J. P. A.; Greenland, S.; Hlatky, M. A. (Lancet, 2014)

PRISMA. PRISMA endorsers. 2015. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Endorsement/PRISMAEndorsers.aspx. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study - Page, M. J.; Shamseer, L.; Altman, D. G. (PLoS Med, 2016)

Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. London, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration - Liberati, A.; Altman, D. G.; Tetzlaff, J. (PLoS Med, 2009)

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews - Moher, D.; Tetzlaff, J.; Tricco, A. C.; Sampson, M.; Altman, D. G. (PLoS Med, 2007)

Changing incentives to publish - Franzoni, C.; Scellato, G.; Stephan, P. (Science, 2011)

Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals - Bartholomew, R. E. (J R Soc Med, 2014)

Firm action needed on predatory journals - Clark, J.; Smith, R. (BMJ, 2015)

The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses - Ioannidis, J. P. A. (Milbank Q, 2016)

Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses - Cramer, K.; Wiebe, N.; Moyer, V. (BMC Pediatr, 2005)

Children are not just small adults: the urgent need for high-quality trial evidence in children - Klassen, T. P.; Hartling, L.; Craig, J. C.; Offringa, M. (PLoS Med, 2008)

Challenges to excellence in child health research: call for papers - Zylke, J. W.; Rivara, F. P.; Bauchner, H. (JAMA, 2012)

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews - Bow, S.; Klassen, J.; Chisholm, A. (BMC Pediatr, 2010)

Crick K, Thomson D, Fernandes RM, et al. Descriptive analysis of Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013. BMC Pediatr 2017;17(1):155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0908-7.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement - Moher, D. a. v. i. d.; Liberati, A. l. e. s. s. a. n. d. r. o.; Tetzlaff, J. e. n. n. i. f. e. r.; Altman, D. o. u. g. l. a. s. G. (PLoS Medicine, 2009)

Maintenance of smoking cessation in the postpartum period: which interventions work best in the long-term? - Su, A.; Buttenheim, A. M. (Matern Child Health J, 2014)

Sexual and physical abuse in childhood is associated with depression and anxiety over the life course: systematic review and meta-analysis - Lindert, J.; Von Ehrenstein, O. S.; Grashow, R.; Gal, G.; Braehler, E.; Weisskopf, M. G. (Int J Public Health, 2014)

Associations of consumption of fruits and vegetables during pregnancy with infant birth weight or small for gestational age births: a systematic review of the literature - Murphy, M. M.; Stettler, N.; Smith, K. M.; Reiss, R. (Int J Womens Health, 2014)

Congenital heart defects and maternal fever: systematic review and meta-analysis - Shi, Q. Y.; Zhang, J. B.; Mi, Y. Q.; Song, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y. L. (J Perinatol, 2014)

Breastfeeding and childhood asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis - Dogaru, C. M.; Nyffenegger, D.; Pescatore, A. M.; Spycher, B. D.; Kuehni, C. E. (Am J Epidemiol, 2014)

Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey - Montori, V. i. c. t. o. r. M.; Wilczynski, N. a. n. c. y. L.; Morgan, D. o. u. g. l. a. s.; Haynes, R. B. r. i. a. n. (BMJ, 2004)

The World Bank Group. World Bank country and lending groups. 2017. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519. Accessed 13 September 2017.

The Cochrane Collaboration. Review groups. 2017. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/ca/contact/review-groups. Accessed 13 September 2017.

The GRADE working group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence - Hultcrantz, M.; Rind, D.; Akl, E. A.; Treweek, S.; Mustafa, R. A.; Iorio, A. (J Clin Epidemiol, 2017)

Cochrane Community. Prioritization list project. 2018 Available from: https://community.cochrane.org/review-production/production-resources/prioritization-list-project. Accessed 11 Sept 2018.

Global and national burden of diseases and injuries among children and adolescents between 1990 and 2013: findings from the global burden of disease 2013 study (JAMA Pediatr, 2016)

Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research - Doyle, J.; Waters, E.; Yach, D.; McQueen, D.; De Francisco, A.; Stewart, T. (J Epidemiol Community Health, 2005)

Health research prioritization at WHO: an overview of methodology and high level analysis of WHO led health research priority setting exercises - Viergever, R. F.; Terry, R.; Matsoso, M. (World Health Organization, 2010)

Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions – a systematic review - Peinemann, F.; Tushabe, D. A.; Kleijnen, J. (PLoS One, 2013)

A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature - Samaan, Z.; Mbuagbaw, L.; Kosa, D.; Debono, V. B.; Dillenburg, R.; Zhang, S. (J Multidiscip Healthc, 2013)

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews - Shea, B. J.; Hamel, C.; Wells, G. A.; Bouter, L. M.; Kristjansson, E.; Grimshaw, J. (J Clin Epidemiol, 2009)

Survey of instructions for authors on how to report an update of a systematic review: guidance is needed - Pieper, D.; Mathes, T. (Evid Based Med, 2017)

When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist - Garner, P.; Hopewell, S.; Chandler, J.; MacLehose, H.; Akl, E. A.; Beyene, J. (BMJ, 2016)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both - Shea, B. J.; Reeves, B. C.; Wells, G.; Thuku, M.; Hamel, C.; Moran, J. (BMJ, 2017)

Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews - Buscemi, N.; Hartling, L.; Vandermeer, B.; Tjosvold, L.; Klassen, T. P. (J Clin Epidemiol, 2006)

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations - Guyatt, G. H.; Oxman, A. D.; Vist, G. E.; Kunz, R.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Alonso-Coello, P. (BMJ, 2008)